The court concluded that the correct program of motion might have been to grant a decree for joint possession in favor with the predecessor-in-desire. This situation highlights the necessity of recognizing undivided property rights along with the necessity of granting acceptable treatments on the parties associated. It could, but only https://co-ownership-and-partitio94624.azzablog.com/31280065/about-illegal-encroachments-advocate-in-karachi